
handle: 2263/72252
Modern synthetic aperture radar (SAR) systems have size, weight, power and cost (SWAP‐C) limitations since platforms are becoming smaller while SAR operating modes are becoming more complex. Thus, SAR systems are producing an ever‐increasing volume of data that needs to be transferred to a ground station for processing. A compression algorithm seeks to reduce the data volume of the raw data; however, the algorithm can cause degradation and losses that may degrade the effectiveness of the SAR mission. This work addresses the lack of standardised quantitative performance metrics so that the performance of SAR data‐compression algorithms can be objectively quantified. Therefore, metrics are established in two different domains, namely the data domain and the image domain. Since different levels of degradation are acceptable for different SAR applications, a trade‐off can be made between the data reduction and the degradation caused by the algorithm. Due to SWAP‐C limitations, there remains a trade‐off between the performance and the computational complexity of the compression algorithm.
Data reduction, Image coding, Data domain, weight, 600, SAR data-compression algorithms, Raw SAR data, Synthetic aperture radar (SAR), Radar imaging, Size, SAR operating modes, Data compression, Modern synthetic aperture radar systems, SWAP-C limitations, SAR mission, Data volume, SAR applications, Standardised quantitative performance metrics, SAR systems, power and cost (SWAP-C)
Data reduction, Image coding, Data domain, weight, 600, SAR data-compression algorithms, Raw SAR data, Synthetic aperture radar (SAR), Radar imaging, Size, SAR operating modes, Data compression, Modern synthetic aperture radar systems, SWAP-C limitations, SAR mission, Data volume, SAR applications, Standardised quantitative performance metrics, SAR systems, power and cost (SWAP-C)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
