
Abstract Purpose Cancer is a life threatening disease with negative impact on quality of life and psychological well-being. In international studies, one-to-one peer support and counseling have been shown to improve the psychological well-being of cancer patients. In the study presented, we developed and evaluated an innovative program of peer-coaching. In this program at the University Hospital of Freiburg, cancer survivors were trained to support peers by sharing experience. Methods In the project, N = 25 cancer survivors were trained to conduct supportive one-to-one conversations with acute patients or patients in aftercare. Based on a prospective observational study, patients were interviewed using questionnaires before and after the conversations. We assessed expectations and experiences with the peer-coaching as well as psychosocial parameters (PHQ9, GAD7, SSUK, NCCN-distress thermometer). Results A total of 52 patients had at least one contact with a peer-coach. Most of the patients attended 1–3 sessions. In total, 85 contacts pairing peer-coaches with patients were conducted. Patients showed on average a high level of distress but a low rate of psychiatric comorbidity. The supportive conversations met the patients` needs. Sharing experiences and empowerment were the most relevant benefits for the patients. Both patients and trained peers showed high satisfaction levels with the program. Conclusion Our findings support the feasibility and utility of a peer-coaching program in which trained cancer survivors, acting as peer-coaches, support other patients during or after their oncological treatment. In a further study, the efficacy of peer-coaching should be investigated based on a randomized-controlled trial. Trial registration The trial was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (No. DRKS DRKS00017500) on 12.12.2019.
Male, Adult, Counseling, Cancer Survivors/psychology [MeSH] ; Surveys and Questionnaires [MeSH] ; Female [MeSH] ; Cancer ; Aged [MeSH] ; Adult [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Prospective Studies [MeSH] ; Empowerment ; Patient participation ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Counseling/methods [MeSH] ; Psycho-oncology ; Mentoring/methods [MeSH] ; Peer Group [MeSH] ; Quality of life ; Male [MeSH] ; Quality of Life [MeSH] ; Research ; Neoplasms/psychology [MeSH] ; Pilot Projects [MeSH] ; Neoplasms/therapy [MeSH] ; Social Support [MeSH] ; Peer-coaching, Research, 610, Mentoring, Social Support, Pilot Projects, Middle Aged, Peer Group, Cancer Survivors, Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires, Quality of Life, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Aged
Male, Adult, Counseling, Cancer Survivors/psychology [MeSH] ; Surveys and Questionnaires [MeSH] ; Female [MeSH] ; Cancer ; Aged [MeSH] ; Adult [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Prospective Studies [MeSH] ; Empowerment ; Patient participation ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Counseling/methods [MeSH] ; Psycho-oncology ; Mentoring/methods [MeSH] ; Peer Group [MeSH] ; Quality of life ; Male [MeSH] ; Quality of Life [MeSH] ; Research ; Neoplasms/psychology [MeSH] ; Pilot Projects [MeSH] ; Neoplasms/therapy [MeSH] ; Social Support [MeSH] ; Peer-coaching, Research, 610, Mentoring, Social Support, Pilot Projects, Middle Aged, Peer Group, Cancer Survivors, Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires, Quality of Life, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
