
pmid: 38491933
pmc: PMC11283197
handle: 10230/70932 , 20.500.12530/137784 , 10261/385865 , 11571/1493335
pmid: 38491933
pmc: PMC11283197
handle: 10230/70932 , 20.500.12530/137784 , 10261/385865 , 11571/1493335
Abstract Background The role of duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) as an early detection and intervention target to improve outcomes for individuals with first-episode psychosis is unknown. Study Design PRISMA/MOOSE-compliant systematic review to identify studies until February 1, 2023, with an intervention and a control group, reporting DUP in both groups. Random effects meta-analysis to evaluate (1) differences in DUP in early detection/intervention services vs the control group, (2) the efficacy of early detection strategies regarding eight real-world outcomes at baseline (service entry), and (3) the efficacy of early intervention strategies on ten real-world outcomes at follow-up. We conducted quality assessment, heterogeneity, publication bias, and meta-regression analyses (PROSPERO: CRD42020163640). Study Results From 6229 citations, 33 intervention studies were retrieved. The intervention group achieved a small DUP reduction (Hedges’ g = 0.168, 95% CI = 0.055–0.283) vs the control group. The early detection group had better functioning levels (g = 0.281, 95% CI = 0.073–0.488) at baseline. Both groups did not differ regarding total psychopathology, admission rates, quality of life, positive/negative/depressive symptoms, and employment rates (P > .05). Early interventions improved quality of life (g = 0.600, 95% CI = 0.408–0.791), employment rates (g = 0.427, 95% CI = 0.135–0.718), negative symptoms (g = 0.417, 95% CI = 0.153–0.682), relapse rates (g = 0.364, 95% CI = 0.117–0.612), admissions rates (g = 0.335, 95% CI = 0.198–0.468), total psychopathology (g = 0.298, 95% CI = 0.014–0.582), depressive symptoms (g = 0.268, 95% CI = 0.008–0.528), and functioning (g = 0.180, 95% CI = 0.065–0.295) at follow-up but not positive symptoms or remission (P > .05). Conclusions Comparing interventions targeting DUP and control groups, the impact of early detection strategies on DUP and other correlates is limited. However, the impact of early intervention was significant regarding relevant outcomes, underscoring the importance of supporting early intervention services worldwide.
Duration of untreated psychosis, 610, Early intervention, meta-analysi, Time-to-Treatment, duration of untreated psychosi, Early Medical Intervention, 616, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Psychotic Disorders/therapy; Humans; Early Diagnosis; Early Medical Intervention/statistics & numerical data; Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data; Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data; Schizophrenia/therapy; duration of untreated psychosis; early detection; early intervention; meta-analysis; outcome, Humans, early detection, Meta-analysis; outcome, Outcome, Early detection, meta-analysis, Meta-analysis, early intervention, Early Diagnosis, Psychotic Disorders, outcome, Schizophrenia, duration of untreated psychosis, Regular Articles
Duration of untreated psychosis, 610, Early intervention, meta-analysi, Time-to-Treatment, duration of untreated psychosi, Early Medical Intervention, 616, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Psychotic Disorders/therapy; Humans; Early Diagnosis; Early Medical Intervention/statistics & numerical data; Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data; Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data; Schizophrenia/therapy; duration of untreated psychosis; early detection; early intervention; meta-analysis; outcome, Humans, early detection, Meta-analysis; outcome, Outcome, Early detection, meta-analysis, Meta-analysis, early intervention, Early Diagnosis, Psychotic Disorders, outcome, Schizophrenia, duration of untreated psychosis, Regular Articles
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
