
Students with Down syndrome respond positively to adaptive AI learning systems, but existing models struggle to effectively accommodate their unique challenges in working memory and attention control. These limitations stem from rigid clustering methods, which fail to personalize learning pathways according to the individual cognitive needs of students. This paper proposes a theoretical framework integrating Neutrosophic C-Means Clustering (NCM) into adaptive AI for special education. Grounded in cognitive theories on Down syndrome, the framework applies neutrosophic logic to refine membership functions truth, indeterminacy, and falsity and categorizes errors into conceptual, procedural, and attentional clusters. Rather than treating engagement as a fixed metric, this framework reinterprets indeterminacy as a dynamic state, allowing AI systems to adapt to variations in learner responsiveness and facilitate smoother human-AI interaction. While this remains a conceptual model, it sets the stage for future AI-assisted personalized learning systems, enabling educators and AI designers to collaborate in creating more flexible, responsive, and inclusive learning technologies. Furthermore, this paper highlights key ethical concerns, including bias risks in AI-driven education and maintaining human oversight to ensure fairness and inclusivity in AI-assisted learning environments.
Neutrosophic Clustering, Down Syndrome Education, L, Personalized Learning, Adaptive AI, Education
Neutrosophic Clustering, Down Syndrome Education, L, Personalized Learning, Adaptive AI, Education
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
