
AbstractAlthough the multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) have been proved to bring promising prospects for solving multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs), the performance of the algorithm deteriorates sharply in high-dimensional objective space due to the weak selection pressure and the unregulated balance, which is caused by the increase of objective space dimension. Some current MOEAs with two-stage strategy (TS) strive to address above issues by dividing the evolutionary process into two independent stages, in which convergence and diversity are handled separately within successive generations of different stages. However, TS-MOEAs have some weaknesses, such as sensitivity to stage division, and incomplete separation of convergence and diversity. In this paper, TS/KW-MaOEA is proposed for solving many-objective optimization problems (MaOPs), which keeps TS as the central and equips a perfect control mechanism for separated balance. More specifically, TS/KW-MaOEA can automatically adjust the balance trend and provide appropriate selection pressure for MaOPs according to the Kondratiev wave (KW) search model and the objective space dimension. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm, a series of experiments are carried out against seven state-of-the-art many-objective optimization algorithms on 15 benchmark problems with up to 30 objectives. Experimental results indicate that the proposed algorithm is highly competitive against peer competitors.
Many-objective optimization, Diversity, Two-stage strategy, Evolutionary algorithm, Electronic computers. Computer science, QA75.5-76.95, Information technology, Convergence, T58.5-58.64
Many-objective optimization, Diversity, Two-stage strategy, Evolutionary algorithm, Electronic computers. Computer science, QA75.5-76.95, Information technology, Convergence, T58.5-58.64
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
