Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Revealing Implicit Correspondence between Bytecode Instructions and Expressions Determined by Java Compilers

Authors: Izuru Kume; Masahide Nakamura; Naoya Nitta;

Revealing Implicit Correspondence between Bytecode Instructions and Expressions Determined by Java Compilers

Abstract

Most Java debuggers designate a source code line as the executed part in the source code at each step-by-step execution. Such designation is based on compilation results which give line numbers to byte code instructions executed at debugging. Because a source code line contains many expressions in general, debugger users must simulate microscopic executions of such contained expressions in their mind. This kind of internal simulation is one of the causes of inefficiency at debugging. We aim at supporting an implementation of a feature to designate expressions instead of source code lines. As its first step, we propose a method to examine how a given compiler maps bytecode instructions to expressions. The key idea of our method is to decompose lexical tokens in each expression into different source code lines. Because of the one-to-one correspondence between line numbers and tokens obtained by our decomposition, we can reveal hidden intention of a compiler to map bytecode instructions to expressions. In this paper, we introduce our experimental results to apply our method to Java programs compiled by a standard Java compiler. We discuss the feasibility of our method with respect to our goal, which is an implementation of a feature to designate expressions instead of source code lines.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!