
The Chow-Liu algorithm (IEEE Trans.~Inform.~Theory, 1968) has been a mainstay for the learning of tree-structured graphical models from i.i.d.\ sampled data vectors. Its theoretical properties have been well-studied and are well-understood. In this paper, we focus on the class of trees that are arguably even more fundamental, namely {\em homogeneous} trees in which each pair of nodes that forms an edge has the same correlation $��$. We ask whether we are able to further reduce the error probability of learning the structure of the homogeneous tree model when {\em active learning} or {\em active sampling of nodes or variables} is allowed. Our figure of merit is the {\em error exponent}, which quantifies the exponential rate of decay of the error probability with an increasing number of data samples. At first sight, an improvement in the error exponent seems impossible, as all the edges are statistically identical. We design and analyze an algorithm Active Learning Algorithm for Trees with Homogeneous Edge (Active-LATHE), which surprisingly boosts the error exponent by at least 40\% when $��$ is at least $0.8$. For all other values of $��$, we also observe commensurate, but more modest, improvements in the error exponent. Our analysis hinges on judiciously exploiting the minute but detectable statistical variation of the samples to allocate more data to parts of the graph in which we are less confident of being correct.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Statistics - Machine Learning, Machine Learning (stat.ML), Machine Learning (cs.LG)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Statistics - Machine Learning, Machine Learning (stat.ML), Machine Learning (cs.LG)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
