
Effective promotion systems recognize and reward teachers' dedication, incentivizing professional development and career progression. This study investigated the experiences and understanding of public elementary teachers in selected divisions in Region XII, Philippines, regarding the previous and new changes to the Department of Education's promotion system. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach was used, combining quantitative surveys followed by qualitative interviews. Findings revealed that teachers generally understand both systems, emphasizing performance rating, experience, and education. Improvement areas include a clearer assessment of potential and more training in the previous system, while the new system needs smoother implementation and needs to address concerns about workload and transparency. Qualitative analysis identified key themes related to teacher experiences such as promotion types, criteria, self-directed learning, and equity and concerns regarding the new changes such as understanding, system acceptance, workload, and transparency. This study underscores the importance of addressing teachers' understanding and experiences when implementing changes. Effective communication and clear information are crucial for morale and development. A well-designed promotion system prioritizing meritocracy, equity, and teacher well-being can enhance the teaching force and elevate education standards in Region XII. The research provides insights for DepEd policymakers to refine the promotion system and develop a Career Path Orientation Program (CPOP) responsive to teachers' needs and aspirations.
understanding, education, H, explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach, Social Sciences, teacher promotion system, region xii, experiences, philippines, career development, L, Education
understanding, education, H, explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach, Social Sciences, teacher promotion system, region xii, experiences, philippines, career development, L, Education
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
