
handle: 11573/1744954
Abstract This paper proposes an innovative method to determine the optimal ranking of a set of univariate units in the maximum number of clusters with sortable centroids. Units within the identified clusters are considered equivalent, while units between clusters show a significant difference in terms of the variable in study. By means of bootstrap estimates of clusters’ centroids, the proposed procedure allows to identify the optimal number of “well-separated” classes, adding on the deterministic results. Moreover, the bootstrap estimates of units’ membership matrices allow us to define an optimal ranking of these units within the identified clusters: the obtained clusters are ranked so that units within each cluster are represented by the rank of the cluster they belong to. Centroids and membership matrices are obtained by applying a specialized K-means clustering on one dimensional data. This methodology is particularly useful in a framework where the aim is to rank units in equivalence classes in a univariate setting. The performance of the presented methodology is evaluated through a simulation study and compared with some widely used techniques to choose the number of clusters and with Gaussian mixture models. Moreover, two real data applications provide insights on the rank of European cities according to their air pollution level and on the rank of National Basketball Association players in terms of their on-court performance. A graphic visualization of the obtained ranking allows to immediately appreciate both the resulting partition of units into equivalence classes and its stability measurement.
one-dimensional data clustering; ranking in equivalence classes; optimal number of clusters; bootstrap; k-means clustering
one-dimensional data clustering; ranking in equivalence classes; optimal number of clusters; bootstrap; k-means clustering
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
