Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Clinical Oral Implan...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The biomechanical profile of an osseo‐integrated rectangular block implant: A pilot in vivo experimental study

Authors: Efthimios Gazelakis; Roy B. Judge; Joseph E. A. Palamara;

The biomechanical profile of an osseo‐integrated rectangular block implant: A pilot in vivo experimental study

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveA novel implant design, the rectangular block implant (RBI), was investigated as a possible solution to the restoration of the posterior resorbed ridge.AimTo maximally load test the osseo‐integrated RBI in shear and tensile loads and relate these findings to known human masticatory loads as biomechanical proof of the study concept.Materials and methodsTwelve RBIs were design‐manufactured and placed into posterior mandibular saddles in 3 mature greyhound dogs.—2 per left and right. After 12 weeks of healing, osseo‐integration was confirmed using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and wrench torque tests. Three bone blocks each with two RBIs were dissected and mounted in acrylic. Micro‐computerized tomography (μ‐CT) was performed to assess bone to implant contact (BIC), and load analysis was performed using a Universal Test System. Three force applications were conducted until failure: pull‐out (tensile), buccal push from the lingual (shear) and distal push from the mesial (shear). The osteotomy sites were examined using light magnification and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).ResultsPull‐out, buccal and distal force failures occurred at differing levels. Post‐detachment sites showed complex patterns of bone failure, including trabecular and cortical fracture, as well as shearing at varying distances from the BIC. Interfacial shear strength was calculated at 14.4 MPa.ConclusionThe osseo‐integrated RBIs were able to withstand simulations of the demanding axially, bucco‐lingually and mesio‐distally oriented biomechanical challenges of the posterior saddle, under conditions of reduced bone volume. These values exceeded equivalent force components of maximal masticatory loads in humans.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Dental Implants, Dogs, Bone-Anchored Prosthesis, Torque, 617, 610, Animals, Mandible, Biomechanical Phenomena

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!