
Abstract Background The prevalence of sacroiliac joint pain (SIJP) is estimated to be 10–30% in patients with chronic low back pain. Numerous conservative and surgical treatment modalities for SIJP have been described with limited evidence regarding long-term pain relief. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established technique to treat patients with chronic low back pain. However, the effect on patients with SIJP is not consistent. Therefore, peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) for chronic SIJP was implemented in experimental trials. Clinical data on PNS for SIJP is still lacking. The authors present a case series and a protocol for a prospective, multicenter study to determine the effect of PNS in patients with chronic intractable SIJP. Method A multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial was designed. Patients with chronic intractable SIJP will be recruited and randomized in a 4:3 ratio to either the peripheral nerve stimulation group or to the best medical treatment group. A total of 90 patients are planned to be enrolled (52 in the PNS group and 38 in the BMT group). Patients in the intervention group receive a percutaneous implantation of a unilateral or bilateral lead which is externalized for a trial phase for 3–14 days. After trial phase only patients with at least 50% reduction of pain receive an impulse generator for permanent stimulation. Regular visits for participants are planned on day 0, after 3 months (± 30 days), 6 months (± 30 days), and 12 months (± 60 days). The primary outcome measurements is the difference in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) between baseline and after 6 months. Secondary outcomes is improvement of pain associated disability (ODI) and improvement of health-related quality of life after 6 and 12 months. Discussion We have described the protocol for a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial evaluating the influence of PNS on patients with chronic sacroiliac joint syndrome. We believe that PNS on patients with chronic sacroiliac joint syndrome will show promising results regarding pain relief and quality of life in comparison to BMT after 12 months. The design of this trial promises high evidence in comparison to the data to date. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05357300. Registered on April 26, 2022.
Medicine (General), Spinal Cord Stimulation, Neuromodulation, Sacroilicac joint pain, Randomized controlled trial ; Low Back Pain/therapy [MeSH] ; Study Protocol ; Humans [MeSH] ; Peripheral Nerves [MeSH] ; Prospective Studies [MeSH] ; Treatment Outcome [MeSH] ; Chronic Pain/therapy [MeSH] ; Multicenter Studies as Topic [MeSH] ; Sacroiliac Joint [MeSH] ; Sacroilicac joint pain ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic [MeSH] ; Chronic Pain/diagnosis [MeSH] ; Neuromodulation ; Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods [MeSH] ; Peripheral nerve stimulation ; Quality of Life [MeSH] ; Low Back Pain/diagnosis [MeSH], Sacroiliac Joint, Study Protocol, R5-920, Treatment Outcome, Randomized controlled trial, Peripheral nerve stimulation, Quality of Life, Humans, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Prospective Studies, Peripheral Nerves, Chronic Pain, Low Back Pain, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Medicine (General), Spinal Cord Stimulation, Neuromodulation, Sacroilicac joint pain, Randomized controlled trial ; Low Back Pain/therapy [MeSH] ; Study Protocol ; Humans [MeSH] ; Peripheral Nerves [MeSH] ; Prospective Studies [MeSH] ; Treatment Outcome [MeSH] ; Chronic Pain/therapy [MeSH] ; Multicenter Studies as Topic [MeSH] ; Sacroiliac Joint [MeSH] ; Sacroilicac joint pain ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic [MeSH] ; Chronic Pain/diagnosis [MeSH] ; Neuromodulation ; Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods [MeSH] ; Peripheral nerve stimulation ; Quality of Life [MeSH] ; Low Back Pain/diagnosis [MeSH], Sacroiliac Joint, Study Protocol, R5-920, Treatment Outcome, Randomized controlled trial, Peripheral nerve stimulation, Quality of Life, Humans, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Prospective Studies, Peripheral Nerves, Chronic Pain, Low Back Pain, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
