
Right lateral sector grafts (RLSGs) in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) expand donor options, however, their long-term outcomes and complication rates remain unclear. We analyzed 661 LDLTs (42 RLSGs, 363 right liver grafts, 243 left liver grafts, and 13 left lateral section grafts) performed between 2000 and 2021 at the University of Tokyo Hospital. RLSG donors experienced a 4.8% major complication (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3b) rate with no mortality. RLSG recipients had a 38.1% major complication rate and a 9.5% 90-day mortality rate. Compared with other graft types, RLSG recipients had higher rates of hepatic artery thrombosis (9.5% vs. 3.1%), portal vein stenosis (14.3% vs. 1.9%), and biliary stricture (42.9% vs. 16.3%). The 5-year survival rate for RLSG recipients (79.2%) did not differ significantly from other graft types (84.7%). Graft bile ducts measuring >4 mm were associated with increased anastomotic biliary stricture. RLSG, the only option for 33 recipients, expanded the donor pool by 5%. Although RLSG is associated with higher vascular and biliary complication rates, it demonstrates favorable long-term survival and significantly expands the donor pool. For patients without suitable conventional graft options, RLSG represents a viable choice that provides life-saving transplantation opportunities.
living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), RC581-951, biliary stricture, Specialties of internal medicine, right lateral sector graft, donor pool expansion, Health Archive, vascular complication
living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), RC581-951, biliary stricture, Specialties of internal medicine, right lateral sector graft, donor pool expansion, Health Archive, vascular complication
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
