
pmid: 40353861
Abstract The genetic etiology of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (FECD) is not yet fully elucidated. While the disease is widespread and the leading indication for corneal transplantation in the Western world, the concurrent shortage of corneal transplants underscores the urgent need for further research into the underlying mechanisms. Such investigations could enable the development of innovative therapeutic strategies. Therefore, we aimed to verify candidate genes previously identified and sought after novel variants in the German population. Undertaking a genome wide association study (GWAS) using the Axiom™ Precision Medicine Diversity Array on 157 FECD cases and 309 controls, followed by pathway enrichment analysis, we were able to confirm the significance of the TCF4 locus (rs613872, p = 8.0 × 10− 23, OR = 8.60, h2 = 0.72) and identified a range of novel variants. Further fine-mapping highlighted novel candidate SNPs, such as on chromosome 5 in the SEMA6A gene (rs153643, p = 3.1 × 10− 9, OR = 2.75, h2 = 0.30), and on chromosome 19 in the DNAJC19P3 gene (rs62117964, p = 3.3 × 10− 8, OR = 3.61, h2 = 0.29). SEMA6A gene is involved in apoptotic pathways and cytoskeletal remodeling, making it an interesting candidate gene for further investigations as a potential therapeutic target. Furthermore, several variants were identified in lncRNAs, which presumably influence the expression of nearby protein-coding genes. For example, LOC105372130, which is associated with corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor, may influence the expression of TCF4.
ddc:610, Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS), FOS: Biological sciences, Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (FECD), Genetics, 610 Medizin und Gesundheit, Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), Original Investigation, TCF4
ddc:610, Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS), FOS: Biological sciences, Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (FECD), Genetics, 610 Medizin und Gesundheit, Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), Original Investigation, TCF4
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
