
A problem common to all clustering techniques is the difficulty of deciding the number of clusters present in the data. The aim of this paper is to compare three methods based on the hypervolume criterion with four other well-known methods. This evaluation of procedures for determining the number of clusters is conducted on artificial data sets. To provide a variety of solutions the data sets are analysed by six clustering methods. We finally conclude by pointing out the performance of each method and by giving some guidance for making choices between them.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
