
The robust decision-making framework (RDM) has been extended to consider multiple objective functions and scenarios. However, the practical applications of these extensions are mostly limited to academic case studies. The main reasons are: (i) substantial cognitive load in tracking all the trade-offs across scenarios and the interplay between uncertainties and trade-offs, (ii) lack of decision-makers’ involvement in solution generation and confidence. To address these problems, this study proposes a novel interactive framework involving decision-makers in searching for the most preferred robust solutions utilizing interactive multiobjective optimization methods. The proposed interactive framework provides a learning phase for decision-makers to discover the problem characteristics, the feasibility of their preferences, and how uncertainty may affect the outcomes of a decision. This involvement and learning allow them to control and direct the multiobjective search during the solution generation process, boosting their confidence and assurance in implementing the identified robust solutions in practice.
peerReviewed
School of Wellbeing, mallintaminen, scenario planning, multiple criteria decision-making, päätöksenteko, päättäjät, School of Resource Wisdom, Multiobjective Optimization Group, interactive methods, epävarmuus, Computational Science, Resurssiviisausyhteisö, ympäristökysymykset, future uncertainty, tulevaisuudenodotukset, multi-objective optimization, optimointi, robust decision making, Hyvinvoinnin tutkimuksen yhteisö, Laskennallinen tiede
School of Wellbeing, mallintaminen, scenario planning, multiple criteria decision-making, päätöksenteko, päättäjät, School of Resource Wisdom, Multiobjective Optimization Group, interactive methods, epävarmuus, Computational Science, Resurssiviisausyhteisö, ympäristökysymykset, future uncertainty, tulevaisuudenodotukset, multi-objective optimization, optimointi, robust decision making, Hyvinvoinnin tutkimuksen yhteisö, Laskennallinen tiede
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
