
Federated Learning has been rapidly gaining in popularity in medical applications, due to the increased privacy offered, since medical data doesn't need to leave the hospitals' premises for AI model training. However, a direct translation of a classic experiment to a federated one is not always straightforward. In this work, we delve into the intricacies of federated learning for a breast cancer classification tool. We compare classic model training with a federated variant, and highlight the adaptations that need to be taken care of to ensure the equivalence between the two. Specifically, we introduce the Breast Area Detection tool as an essential component of the pre-processing pipeline to enhance the robustness of Federated Learning by offering data harmonization. On top of that, we present an end-to-end Federated Learning framework that is effective for real-world data and scenarios. Among the three real-world hospitals involved in the experimental procedure, the proposed framework significantly improves performance at the first hospital, providing consistent results similar to those achieved in the classic approach. Experimental results demonstrate that the interventions introduced improved model performance by approximately 35%, aligning federated learning and centralized model performance.
BIRADS classification, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Informàtica::Intel·ligència artificial::Aprenentatge automàtic, Deep learning, Medical imaging, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria de la telecomunicació::Processament del senyal::Processament de la imatge i del senyal vídeo, Federated Learning, Privacy preservation, Mammography, Research Article
BIRADS classification, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Informàtica::Intel·ligència artificial::Aprenentatge automàtic, Deep learning, Medical imaging, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria de la telecomunicació::Processament del senyal::Processament de la imatge i del senyal vídeo, Federated Learning, Privacy preservation, Mammography, Research Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
