Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Advances in Medical ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: PubMed Central
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Evaluating Unstructured Clinical Teaching During Rotations: How Medical Students’ Experiences in Paediatrics and Gynaecology Influence Perceived Learning Outcomes

Authors: Verneri Hannula; Lari Lehtovirta; Linda Kourunen; Markku Sumanen;

Evaluating Unstructured Clinical Teaching During Rotations: How Medical Students’ Experiences in Paediatrics and Gynaecology Influence Perceived Learning Outcomes

Abstract

Verneri Hannula,1,2 Lari Lehtovirta,1 Linda Kourunen,1 Markku Sumanen1 1Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland; 2Tampere University Hospital, The Wellbeing Services County of Pirkanmaa, Tampere, FinlandCorrespondence: Markku Sumanen, Email Markku.Sumanen@Tuni.fiObjective: Learning in the clinical environment is crucial for students to enhance practical skills. However, due to the variability of clinical settings, providing consistent teaching and sufficient patient cases can be challenging. As a result, the perceived quality of rotations often varies. Previous studies have reported mixed findings on whether teaching quality or patient encounters influence students’ perceptions of rotation quality or exam performance. Additionally, previous studies have often focused on structured teaching in clinical settings. We aimed to explore how students’ evaluations of clinical teaching outside structured learning events during rotations impact the perceived achievement of learning goals.Methods: We analysed student evaluations from paediatric and gynaecology rotations at Tampere University Medical School during the 2021– 2022 academic year. Evaluations covered clinical teaching quality, opportunities to examine patients, and perform procedures. A linear regression model was used to assess the influence of these factors on the perceived achievement of learning goals, with the statement “I achieved the given learning goals” as the dependent variable.Results: A total of 140 students evaluated the paediatric and 142 the gynaecology rotations, providing 833 and 1188 evaluations, respectively. All questions received mean scores above 5 on a 7-point scale. The mean for achieving learning goals was 5.6 for paediatrics and 5.7 for gynaecology. All independent variables showed significant associations with the dependent variable, with “The use of time was meaningful” having the greatest impact.Conclusion: Students generally reported successfully achieving their learning goals in both rotations. Notably, the perceived meaningful use of time had the greatest impact on the perceived achievement of learning outcomes.Keywords: clinical teaching, paediatrics, gynaecology, undergraduate medical education, rotation

Related Organizations
Keywords

Gynaecology, Medicine (General), R5-920, Clinical teaching, Rotation, LC8-6691, Paediatrics, Undergraduate medical education, Special aspects of education, Original Research

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
gold
Related to Research communities