
A method of electrophysical chromatography was proposed to visualize the results of electrical non-destructive testing for the first time. Surface potentiograms usually used to represent the results of scanning contact potentiometry are replaced by volumetric images of structural inhomogeneities. The alternative has obvious advantages as useful additional information can drastically change the results of testing which is demonstrated by the example of a weld overlay. Methodological recommendations for constructing volumetric images of defects are formulated and implemented. The causes of self-shielding of structural inhomogeneities at different levels of fixation which are due to the mutual spatial overlap of microregions emitting waves of elastic stresses are discussed. The biggest problems in identifying defects for NDT are their complete or partial screening. The electrophysical chromatography method requires at least one experimental array obtained from the following measurements: double scanning of the surfaces of the test object; double simultaneous scanning of the surfaces of the test object; double simultaneous scanning of the surfaces of the test object using a radiation synchronizer in time or frequency. In the case of scanning along one (external or internal) surface, the coordinates of defects are determined from the corresponding cross sections and the calculated values of their depth using frequency and time-frequency analysis
техническая диагностика и неразрушающий контроль реакторного оборудования, электрический неразрушающий контроль, электрофизическая хроматография, TK9001-9401, Nuclear engineering. Atomic power, метод сканирующей контактной потенциометрии
техническая диагностика и неразрушающий контроль реакторного оборудования, электрический неразрушающий контроль, электрофизическая хроматография, TK9001-9401, Nuclear engineering. Atomic power, метод сканирующей контактной потенциометрии
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
