Truth in judicial interpretation from positivist and non-positivist perspectives
Copyright policy )Truth in judicial interpretation from positivist and non-positivist perspectives
Lawyers work with statements about verisimilitude of factual statements, while trustworthiness of these statements is evaluated against the backdrop of coherence of factual descriptions. A correct conclusion in law means a consistent reconstruction of normative meanings in the way that fits best the normative system and that allows to cogently subsume factual state of affair under the established normative meaning.
- National Research University of Electronic Technology Russian Federation
судебное толкование, действительность, истинностное значение, Дворкин, Рональд 1931-2013, правовые нормы, юридический процесс, истина в толковании, Кельзен, Ганс 1881-1973
судебное толкование, действительность, истинностное значение, Дворкин, Рональд 1931-2013, правовые нормы, юридический процесс, истина в толковании, Кельзен, Ганс 1881-1973
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!