
Early Diagnosis of oral cancer is very important and can save you from some oral malignancies. However, while this approach aids in the rapid healing of patients and the preservation of their lives, there are several causes for poor and wrong diagnosis of oral cancer. In recent years, the use of computer-aided design diagnosis tools as an auxiliary tool alongside clinicians has greatly benefited in more accurate identification of this malignancy. The current study proposes a new approach for identifying oral cancer patients based on image processing and deep learning. The current study employs a recently integrated model of an improved tunicate swarm algorithm to produce an efficient tool for improving a convolutional neural network and delivering an accurate cancer diagnostic system. The approach is then implemented on the oral cancer pictures dataset. The approach is then validated by comparing it to other published papers using various measurement markers. The proposed model achieved an accuracy of 98.70% and a recall of 93.71% in detecting oral cancerous lesions from photographic images. The model also achieved an F1-score of 90.08% and a precision of 96.42%. The final results demonstrate that the offered approach can produce more exact results and can be used in conjunction with clinicians to help in diagnosing oral cancer.
Photographic image analysis, Science, Q, Oral cancer detection, Improved tunicate swarm algorithm, R, Deep learning, Article, Deep Learning, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Medicine, Humans, Animals, Convolutional neural networks, Mouth Neoplasms, Neural Networks, Computer, Urochordata, Algorithms, Early Detection of Cancer
Photographic image analysis, Science, Q, Oral cancer detection, Improved tunicate swarm algorithm, R, Deep learning, Article, Deep Learning, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Medicine, Humans, Animals, Convolutional neural networks, Mouth Neoplasms, Neural Networks, Computer, Urochordata, Algorithms, Early Detection of Cancer
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
