
Wireless IoT networks have seen an unprecedented rise in number of devices, heterogeneity and emerging use cases which led to diverse throughput, reliability and latency (Quality of Service) requirements. Fulfilling these diverse requirements in a rapidly changing and dynamic wireless environment is a complex and challenging task. On top of including new technologies and wireless standards, one solution is to deploy cross-layer Design (CLD) and multiple Radio Access Technologies (Multi-RAT) to develop scalable QoS-aware IoT networks. However, the complexity of such solutions is high as it involves complex inter-layer interactions and dependencies and inter-application dependencies in multi-RAT networks. Moreover, the wireless environment is very dynamic, so having an optimal constellation of parameters is a challenging task. In this paper, we address the possibilities of using Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) to address these high dimensional and dynamic problems. Based on our findings, we have proposed a distributed network management framework employing AI & ML for studying inter-layer dependencies and developing cross-layer design, traffic classification and traffic prediction at the edge devices for reliable QoS in multi-RAT IoT networks. A thorough discussion on future directions and emerging challenges related to our proposed framework has also been provided for further research in this field.
edge intelligence, multi-RAT networks, AI & ML for cross-layer design, cross-layer optimization, Telecommunication, QoS in IoT networks, TK5101-6720, reliable QoS, Transportation and communications, HE1-9990
edge intelligence, multi-RAT networks, AI & ML for cross-layer design, cross-layer optimization, Telecommunication, QoS in IoT networks, TK5101-6720, reliable QoS, Transportation and communications, HE1-9990
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
