
doi: 10.26807/rr.v4i4.111
Abstract The International Court of Justice, to ensure friendly relationships between the international community, has recognized the importance of the principles of non-intervention and prohibited the use of force as a limit and guarantee of the sovereignty of nations. Nevertheless, during 2022 actions have been presented in the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict that can be considered illegal inferences that involve the use of force. The present article aims to analyze the events that occurred during this conflict and contrast them with the international principles of non-intervention and prohibited use of force based on the ICJ jurisprudence and doctrinal approaches. In conclusion, the transgression of the analyzed principles by Russia against Ukraine is argued, which leads to the existence of international liability and the duty to repair and indemnify.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
