Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Maskanaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Maskana
Article . 2016
Data sources: DOAJ
addClaim

Modelos de calidad de software: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura

Authors: Ana Villalta; Juan Pablo Carvallo;

Modelos de calidad de software: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura

Abstract

RESUMEN La evaluación de la calidad de un producto de software juega un papel fundamental tanto en la selección de componentes de software, como en la valoración de un producto resultante de un proyecto de desarrollo. Los Modelos de Calidad del Software (QMs), son artefactos específicamente diseñados y construidos para apoyar en estos procesos. En este trabajo resume el proceso de aplicación de la técnica de Revisión Sistemática de la Literatura, utilizada para actualizar el estado del arte en relación a QM, levantado en un proceso previo realizado en 2007, con el objeto de incluir los trabajos relacionados que han sido publicados entre el 2007 y 2014. El estudio se enfoca los elementos estructurales, propiedades, métodos de construcción y aplicaciones para las cuales han propuestos los QM en este periodo. Palabras clave: Modelos de calidad de software, QMs, revisión sistemática de la literatura, SLR. ABSTRACT Quality evaluation of a software product plays an important role both, in the selection of software components and quality assessment of the deliverables resulting from a software development project. Software Quality Models (QMs) are artifacts specifically designed and constructed to support these activities. This paper summarizes the process of application of a Systematic Literature Review, leaded to update the State of the art in relation to QM resulting from a previous process carried out in 2007, in order to identify and include related works that have been published between 2007 and 2014. The study focuses on the structural elements, properties, construction methods and applications for which QM have been used in this period. Keywords: Software quality models, QMs, systematic literature review, SLR.

Keywords

Social sciences (General), H1-99, Q1-390, Science (General)

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold