
Foram realizados dois experimentos, com objetivo de avaliar a suscetibilidade de Brachiaria subquadripara e Brachiaria mutica a diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pósemergência. Os herbicidas e doses testados foram: glyphosate (Rodeo) a 2.400, 3.360 e 4.320 g e.a. ha-1 com Aterbane a 0,5% v/v; glyphosate a 2.400, 3.360 e 4.320 g e.a. ha-1 com Silwet a 0,1% v/v; imazapyr (Arsenal) a 750 e 1.500 g e.a. ha-1; e diquat (Reward) a 400 e 800 g i.a. ha-1 com aplicação seqüencial. Manteve-se uma testemunha sem aplicação de herbicidas. As parcelas experimentais foram constituídas de caixas d'água de 60 x 60 x 45 cm, com 55 L de solo. A aplicação foi realizada quando as plantas se encontravam a 45 e 65 cm de altura para B. subquadripara e B. mutica, respectivamente. Foi utilizado um pulverizador costal, a pressão constante de CO2 (2 bars), pontas 110.02 XR, com um consumo de calda de 200 L ha-1. O controle foi avaliado visualmente, através de escala percentual de notas, além de se avaliar a massa seca das plantas. O herbicida glyphosate nas doses de 3.360 e 4.320 g e.a. ha-1, independentemente do adjuvante testado, proporcionou controle excelente para as duas espécies, porém as parcelas que receberam glyphosate a 2.400 g e.a. ha-1 apresentaram controle apenas satisfatório. O herbicida imazapyr nas doses de 750 e 1.500 g e.a. ha-1 proporcionou controle eficiente para B. subquadripara e excelente para B. mutica. Já o herbicida diquat, apesar de duas aplicações e independentemente da dose utilizada, mostrou-se ineficiente no controle das duas espécies.Two experiments were carried out to evaluate the susceptibility of Brachiaria subquadripara and Brachiaria mutica to different herbicides applied in post-emergence. The herbicides and doses used were: glyphosate (Rodeo) at 2,400, 3,360 and 4,320 (g a.e. ha-1) plus Aterbane 0.5% v/v; glyphosate at 2,400, 3,360 and 4,320 (g a.e. ha-1) plus Silwet 0.1% v/v; imazapyr (Arsenal) at 750 and 1,500 (g a.e. ha-1), diquat (Reward) at 400 and 800 (g a.i. ha-1) with sequential application and an untreated control. The experimental plots were constituted of 60 x 60 x 45 cm water reservoirs, with 55 L of soil. Herbicides were applied when the plants reached 45 and 65 cm for B. subquadripara and B. mutica, respectively. A CO2 backpack sprayer was used with 2 bars, 110.02 XR nozzles and consumption of 200 L ha-1 spray solution. The control was visually evaluated, through percentile note scale, and plant dry mass as well. The herbicide glyphosate (doses of 3,360 and 4,320 g a.e. ha-1) showed an excellent control for the two species, regardless of the adjuvant tested. However, the plots that had received glyphosate at 2,400 g a.e. ha-1 showed only a satisfactory control. The herbicide imazapyr (doses 750 and 1,500 g a.e. ha-1) provided an effective control for B. subquadripara and a very effective control for B. mutica. The herbicide diquat, although applied twice and regardless of the dosage used, was found to be inefficient in controlling the two species.
adjuvante, QH301-705.5, imazapyr, diquat, Botany, imazapyr, aquatic plant, glyphosate, adjuvant, QK1-989, Biology (General), diquat, planta aquática
adjuvante, QH301-705.5, imazapyr, diquat, Botany, imazapyr, aquatic plant, glyphosate, adjuvant, QK1-989, Biology (General), diquat, planta aquática
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
