
The Civil Procedure Code disciplined the national judicial cooperation allowing greater simplicity and celerity in the interactions between the organs of the judiciary. However, the still incipient theoretical development of this institute has proved to be a decisive factor for its use so far diminished in proportion to its potential. In this intricate context and still lacking precise dogmatic guidelines, this article seeks to evaluate some basic aspects of national judicial cooperation in order to achieve a better understanding of its practical manifestations.
appropriate jurisdiction, Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence, civil procedure law, cooperation, effectiveness, judiciary, K1-7720
appropriate jurisdiction, Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence, civil procedure law, cooperation, effectiveness, judiciary, K1-7720
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
