Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Qualitative Studiesarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Qualitative Studies
Article . 2022
Data sources: DOAJ
addClaim

At udføre kvalitativ forskning med personer med kognitive funktionsnedsættelser

Authors: Cecilie Marie Schmidt Thøgersen; Chalotte Glintborg;

At udføre kvalitativ forskning med personer med kognitive funktionsnedsættelser

Abstract

I takt med et øget fokus på det psykosociale bidrag til rehabiliteringen efter erhvervet hjerneskade og andre sygdomme som leder til kognitive funktionsnedsættelser, er behovet for at kunne foretage kvalitativ forskning af høj kvalitet med denne gruppe steget. Derfor er formålet med denne artikel at belyse og diskutere nogle af de metodiske udfordringer samt styrker vi har mødt i det forskningsdrevne møde med personer med erhvervet hjerneskade (EH). Dermed bidrager denne artikel til en metodisk diskussion som i høj grad er anerkendt som vigtig, men kun i begrænset omfang diskuteres (Glintborg, 2019; Paterson & Scott-Findlay, 2002). Gennem artiklen diskuteres det, hvordan tilpasningen af metodiske tilgange til interviewet, kan lade sig inspirere af den allerede veldokumenterede viden om tilpasningen af terapeutiske samtaler med personer med EH (f.eks. Gallagher et al., 2019). Der arbejdes ud fra fem overordnede grupper af kognitive vanskeligheder og hvordan interviewet som metode bedst muligt tilpasses disse, samtidig med at berettigelse af de kvalitative metoder diskuteres indenfor forskningsområdet.

Keywords

metode, hjerneskade, Social sciences (General), H1-99, kognitiv funktionsnedsættelse, interview, rehabiliteringspsykologisk forskning

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold