
The purpose is to analyze current process improvement approaches. Decision makers can be altered to both the success factors and causes of failure of different process improvement approaches, and help assure practical effectiveness of process improvement efforts. The contribution of this paper is two fold: first, empirical evidence on the drivers of success and failure of four main PI approaches, were synthesized second, based on this empirical evidence, a conceptual framework that guides both the choice and implementation of business process improvement programs is developed.
Technology, S, business process reengineering, T, Science, Q, Agriculture, process management
Technology, S, business process reengineering, T, Science, Q, Agriculture, process management
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
