Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Vojnotehnički Glasni...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Vojnotehnički Glasnik
Article . 2017
Data sources: DOAJ
addClaim

List of referees for year 2017 / Список рецензетов за 2017. год / Spisak recenzenata za 2017. godinu

Authors: Nebojša N. Gaćeša;

List of referees for year 2017 / Список рецензетов за 2017. год / Spisak recenzenata za 2017. godinu

Abstract

All submitted manuscripts relevant to the journal’s profile are reviewed. All referees are eminent experts in relevant fields, with papers published in these fields in the last three years. Editorial Board applies the iThenticate (CrossRef and CrossCheck) service for verifying the originality of submitted papers and for preventing duplicate publishing and plagiarism. Journal applies a „double blind peer review process“ for papers. Authors and reviewers are anonymous to each other in the process of review. Reviews after the article has been published are allowed and encouraged for subsequent evaluation of papers and authors. A peer reviewer assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. / Издание осуществляет рецензирование всех поступающих в редакцию материалов, соответствующих ее тематике, с целью их экспертной оценки. Все рецензенты являются признанными специалистами по тематике рецензируемых материалов и имеют в течение последних 3 лет публикации по тематике рецензируемой статьи. Редакция до момента предоставления статьи рецензентам должна проверить содержание работы на плагиат через системы iThenticate (CrossRef и CrossCheck). Редакция журнала проводит конфиденциальное рецензирование, применяя «двойной слепой метод». Авторы статьи и рецензенты не знают имен друг друга. Редакция разрешает и даже рекомендует рецензирование уже опубликованных статей, с целью дополнительной оценки деятельности авторов и их работ. Специалист-рецензент оказывает Редакции помощь в принятии решений, а при опосредственнойсвязи с авторами через редакцию, существует возможность оказания рецензентом помощи в улучшении текста работы. / Radi stručnog obrazloženja, svi članci koji odgovaraju tematici časopisa se recenziraju. Recenzenti su eminentni stručnjaci iz oblasti iz kojih su i teme radova koji im se šalju na recenziju. Potrebno je da iz tih oblasti recenzenti imaju objavljene radove u poslednje tri godine. Pre slanja na recenziju Redakcija proverava da li je sadržaj rukopisa plagijat, korišćenjem servisa iThenticate (CrossRef i CrossCheck). Časopis primenjuje „dvostruki slepi postupak recenzije“ članaka, koji podrazumeva da autori ne znaju ko su im recenzenti, niti su recenzentima poznati autori. Redakcija dozvoljava i podstiče recenzije i posle objavljivanja članaka radi naknadnog vrednovanja autora i radova. Stručni recenzent pomaže Redakciji u donošenju odluke, a posredstvom kontakata sa autorima, preko Redakcije, može da pomogne i autorima na poboljšavanju teksta rada.

Keywords

Military Science, U, список рецензентов, Military Technical Courier, spisak recenzenata, Vojnotehnicki glasnik, TA1-2040, Vojnotehnički glasnik, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Военно-технический вестник, list of referees

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Published in a Diamond OA journal