Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Arquivo Brasileiro d...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Detecção de Mycoplasma spp. e Ureaplasma diversum em vacas com distúrbios reprodutivos Detection of Mycoplasma spp. and Ureaplasma diversum in cown with reproductive disorders

Authors: M. Buzinhani; E. Metiffogo; J. Timenetsky;

Detecção de Mycoplasma spp. e Ureaplasma diversum em vacas com distúrbios reprodutivos Detection of Mycoplasma spp. and Ureaplasma diversum in cown with reproductive disorders

Abstract

Foram utilizadas 112 amostras de muco vulvovaginal, coletados de vacas com distúrbios reprodutivos, para pesquisa de Mycoplasma e Ureaplasma. Para isolamentos, foram usados meios específicos para micoplasmas (SP-4) e para ureaplasmas. PCR genérica, PCR específica para Mycoplasma bovis e nested-PCR em tubo único para Ureaplasma diversum foram realizados com os DNAs extraídos das amostras. Mycoplasma spp. e U. diversum foram detectados em 12,5 e 25,0%, respectivamente. A PCR genérica resultou em reações positivas em 63,4% das amostras transportadas em SP-4 e em 69,6% das transportadas em meio de ureaplasma. M. bovis foi detectado, na PCR específica, em 9,8% das amostras e U. diversum, na nested-PCR, em 37,5%. Houve maior sensibilidade na metodologia da PCR quando comparada à técnica de cultivo para Mycoplasma e Ureaplasma.In the study, 112 samples of vulvovaginal mucus of cows bearing reproductive disturbance were investigated for Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma. Specific media for the culture of mycoplasmas (SP-4) and ureaplasmas were used. PCR with general primers, PCR specific for Mycoplasma bovis, and nested-PCR in a single tube for Ureaplasma diversum were performed to detect DNA of the sample. Mycoplasma spp. and U. diversum were isolated in 12.5 and 25.0%, respectively. With generic PCR, positive reaction was obtained in 63.4% of the samples transported in SP-4 and 69.6% in ureaplasma medium. M. bovis was detected in 9.8% of samples and nested-PCR in a single tube for U. diversum resulted in 35.0% of positive reaction. Results demonstrated increased sensitivity of PCR methodology compared with culture technique applied to the search of microorganisms of Mycoplasma and Ureasplasma genera.

Keywords

Mycoplasma bovis, Ureaplasma diversum, PCR, cow, vaca, cultura, SF1-1100, culture, Animal culture

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold