Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Memoria Investigacio...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Equipos de Mejora

Authors: Carmen Jaca; Elisabeth Viles; Ricardo Mateo; Javier Santos; Martín Tanco;

Equipos de Mejora

Abstract

El trabajo en equipo es uno de los elementos más importantes para los sistemas de Mejora Continua, ya que facilita el intercambio de información, la resolución de problemas y el desarrollo de las personas. Esta investigación tiene como objetivo obtener conclusiones sobre los factores críticos para conseguir el éxito del trabajo realizado por los equipos de mejora, a través de una investigación cualitativa basada en entrevistas a empresas industriales de la Comunidad Autónoma Vasca, en España, gestionadas según el modelo EFQM y premiadas por su gestión. Para ello se ha adaptado el modelo IMO de efectividad de trabajo en equipo, que permite la evaluación de los distintos factores críticos. Los resultados obtenidos indican que las organizaciones deben prestar atención a los factores relacionados con el equipo y sus miembros, como el reconocimiento grupal y la formación en conjunto, entre otros.

Keywords

Technology, Modelo de efectividad, Participación, Procesos, T, TA1-2040, Trabajo en equipo, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Mejora continua

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold