
Received: 2020/10/16 | Accepted: 2021/4/18 Abstract The Ahādith of Ahl al-Bayt (PBUH) are among the most important resources for exegesis of the Qur’an so the assessment of their credibility can have a tremendous effect on using them in the science of Tafsir. It seems that the comparative survey of informational and informant validity approaches has significant effects in the validation of exegetical Ahādith. By surveying the above 2 approaches and preferring the informational validity approach based on document study, text study, and reference study, the present article attempts to explain the impact of adopting each of the above approaches and the role of Ahādith in the interpretation of the Qur’an. Using descriptive analysis, this research study explains both of the above approaches and then compares them in terms of exegesis of the Qur’an. The Informant validity approach pays attention to the authority of Āhād news in interpretation of the Noble Qur’an and regarding the preference of information validity approach, the application methods of document study, text study, and reference study are presented. © Abbdollāh Zādeh, A; Izadi, M (2021) A Comparative Study of the Informational and Informant Validity Approaches to the Ahādith of Ahl al-Bayt and Its Role in the Exegesis of the Noble Qur’an. Biannual Journal of Comparative Exegetical Researches, 7 (13) 7-30. Doi: 10.22091/PTT.2020.4224.1537
Q1-390, informant validity, Science (General), informational validity, Philosophy. Psychology. Religion, credibility and authority, B, exegetical narrations, document
Q1-390, informant validity, Science (General), informational validity, Philosophy. Psychology. Religion, credibility and authority, B, exegetical narrations, document
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
