Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Media&Jornalismoarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Media&Jornalismo
Article . 2022
Data sources: DOAJ
addClaim

Lembrando dois amigos, revisitando dois livros

Authors: Daniel Dayan;

Lembrando dois amigos, revisitando dois livros

Abstract

Este ensaio é sobre dois amigos próximos, Elihu Katz e Todd Gitlin, e consiste numa reexploração de dois livros: Personal influence e Media events. Começando com Media events (1992), questiono se este prolonga o impulso que esteve na base de Personal influence ou se, pelo contrário, o desvaloriza ao ponto de, por vezes, o contradizer. Passo depois para Personal influence (1955) e olho para as circunstâncias da sua escrita e receção. Como eu era criança quando o livro saiu, confio no impressionante volume que, em 2006, The Annals of American Political and Social Science dedicou à sua génese. Este volume inclui fortes críticas, e discuto muitas delas, incluindo as mais radicais. No entanto, há muitas razões pelas quais acredito que o livro Personal influence não é menos importante hoje do que quando foi publicado. Também sugiro que, apesar da sua famosa contenda, os meus dois amigos por vezes concordaram entre si.

Keywords

Media events, Elihu Katz, Communication. Mass media, Personal influence, Todd Gitlin, P87-96

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Published in a Diamond OA journal