
This article presents the discourse analysis of a political cartoon, created by Vladdo (2011) and published in Semana magazine. It contains three sections. In the first one, there is a general description of the general features of the cartoon based on the discourse characterization by Dominique Mainguenaeau (2005). In the second part, an explanation of the cartoon is provided following Patrick Charaudeau’s (1986, 1992) general setting-up of discourse frame. In the last section, the cartoon is analyzed from an enunciative perspective as outlined by Bajtín/Voloshinov (1998). Following an empirical-deductive methodology, this text aims at showing the strengths of these three analytical approaches, their convergent and divergent points, as well as their potential in the discursive study of language phenomena.
Social sciences (General), H1-99, AZ20-999, History of scholarship and learning. The humanities, discurso, puesta en escena del lenguaje, enunciación, caricatura política.
Social sciences (General), H1-99, AZ20-999, History of scholarship and learning. The humanities, discurso, puesta en escena del lenguaje, enunciación, caricatura política.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
