
The legislator’s amendments made to the Code of Criminal Proceedings in Poland in the last few years have changed it tremendously, making it move away from the standards typical for the criminal trial of a democratic state of law. The article tries to answer the question of whether or not the Polish criminal trial is still democratic. A democratic trial is a trial fitting for a democratic rule of law. The article discusses the features of a democratic state ruled by law and, based on them, indicates factors that allow a criminal trial to be recognized as a rule-of-law trial. The study then presents examples of amendments made to the Code of Criminal Proceedings that have made the Polish criminal process cease to be democratic.
JF20-2112, strengthening the procedural position of the prosecutor, standards of democratic criminal procedure, Political institutions and public administration (General), K, limiting the powers of the criminal court, Law
JF20-2112, strengthening the procedural position of the prosecutor, standards of democratic criminal procedure, Political institutions and public administration (General), K, limiting the powers of the criminal court, Law
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
