Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Revista Brasileira d...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Resultados da avaliação de densidade corporal por meio de diferentes protocolos

Authors: Thainá Caetano Pereira da Silva; Marcelo Henrique Silva; Alexandre Vinícius Malmann Medeiros;

Resultados da avaliação de densidade corporal por meio de diferentes protocolos

Abstract

A avaliação física é um processo que visa estimar a qualidade física das pessoas com análise de diversos parâmetros, dentre eles o cálculo da gordura corporal, que pode ser realizado por vários métodos laboratoriais e de campo. O objetivo deste trabalho é verificar os resultados da avaliação de densidade corporal por meio de diferentes protocolos, comparando e analisando as diferenças e semelhanças estatísticas entre si. A amostra foi composta por 17 mulheres treinadas de Americano do Brasil, com idade Média de 26,35 (anos) +5,99, Massa corporal 78,51 (Kg) + 14,03, Estatura 1,60 (m) + 0,069, IMC 30,41(Kg/m2) + 3,99, Circunferência de Cintura 91,47 (cm) +8,50. O percentual de gordura corporal foi avaliado por 6 diferentes protocolos - Jackson e Pollock 7 dobras, Jackson e Pollock 3 dobras, Guedes 3 dobras, Petroski 4 dobras, Lean et al IMC e Lean et al. CC. Dos resultados encontrados notou-se que protocolos como Lean et al., com o uso apenas de uma balança e um estadiômetro ou mesmo uma fita métrica, e Lean e colaboradores (1996), demonstraram semelhanças estatísticas com protocolos mais caros como Jackson e Pollock 7 dobras e Jackson e Pollock 3 dobras. ABSTRACT Results of the body density assessment by different protocols The physical evaluation is a process that aims to estimate the quality of people with physical analysis of several parameters, including the calculation of the body fat, which can be done by various methods and laboratory field. The objective of this work is to verify the results of the assessment of body density using different protocols, comparing and analyzing the differences and similarities between them statistics. The sample consisted of 17 women trained on American from Brazil, aged 26,35 Average (years) +5.99, 78.51 Body mass (kg) + 14.03, 1.60 Height (m) + 0.069, 30,41 BMI (kg / m2) + 3.99, waist circumference 91.47 (cm) +8.50. The percentage of body fat was evaluated by 6 different protocols - Jackson Pollock and 7 folds, Jackson Pollock and 3-fold, 3-fold Guedes, Petroski 4 folds, Lean et al BMI and Lean et al. CC. The results found it was noted that protocols such as Lean et al., Using only a scale and a stadiometer or even a tape measure, and Lean and collaborators (1996), showed statistical similarities to more expensive protocols such as Jackson Pollock and 7 folds and Jackson and Pollock 3 folds.

Keywords

mulheres, Sports medicine, dobras cutâneas, avaliação física, densidade corporal, RC1200-1245

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold