
Root-finding in nonlinear equations is a fundamental problem in numerical analysis with applications in mathematics and engineering. Traditional methods like the Bisection and False Position methods have been widely used, but they often face challenges related to convergence speed, stability, and computational efficiency. This paper presents two novel numerical root-finding methods that combine the robustness of the Bisection method with the efficiency of the False Position method, improving both convergence rates and stability. Furthermore, we illustrate some numerical applications to discuss error analysis, convergence analysis, and comparisons with existing methods. These findings contribute to the advancement of numerical computation by providing more reliable and efficient root-finding techniques.
Modified Root-finding Methods, QA71-90, False-Position Method, Root-finding Techniques, Numerical Algorithms, Bisection method, Probabilities. Mathematical statistics, Instruments and machines, QA273-280
Modified Root-finding Methods, QA71-90, False-Position Method, Root-finding Techniques, Numerical Algorithms, Bisection method, Probabilities. Mathematical statistics, Instruments and machines, QA273-280
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
