Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Shuitu baochi tongba...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Shuitu baochi tongbao
Article . 2023
Data sources: DOAJ
addClaim

Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment of Ya’an-Kangding Expressway Based on PLUS Model

Authors: Liu Jingjing; Li Xu; Peng Peihao;

Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment of Ya’an-Kangding Expressway Based on PLUS Model

Abstract

[Objective] The regional landscape ecological risks were evaluated, and their spatiotemporal variation was analyzed in order to provide important support for reducing regional ecological risks, maintaining regional ecological security, and promoting regional green development. [Methods] We constructed a landscape ecological risk assessment model based on land use change, and determined the temporal and spatial change characteristics of landscape ecological risk for the Ya’an-Kangding Expressway crossing counties and cities from 2000 to 2020. A geographic detector model with optimized parameters was used to quantitatively analyze the driving factors of landscape ecological risk change. We used the PLUS model to simulate the spatial distribution characteristics and changing trends of landscape ecological risks for the Ya’an-Kangding Expressway passing through counties and cities in 2035. [Results] ① From 2000 to 2020, the main landscape types in the study area were forest land, grassland, and cultivated land, with the fastest growth rate occurring for the impervious surface area (expressway), and the largest increase occurring in forest land area. ② Low and medium landscape ecological risk grades were the main factors. The risk grades spread outward from high to low. ③ Natural factors such as NDVI, elevation, and average annual precipitation were the main driving factors for changes in landscape ecological risk. ④ In 2035, the areas of medium, high, and high risk grades in the study area will decrease under the two different scenarios. The area of significant decline will be particularly obvious under the ecological protection scenario. [Conclusion] The landscape ecological risk levels in the study area were relatively low, mainly low, lower, and medium risk levels, and the ecological environment was gradually improving. The ecological protection scenario was more consistent with the concept of regional sustainable development.

Keywords

land use change, Environmental sciences, landscape ecological risk, General. Including nature conservation, geographical distribution, GE1-350, geographic detector, QH1-199.5, ya’an-kangding expressway, plus model

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold