
The Business-Judgment Rule can be defined as a doctrine that protects directors from personal responsibilities if they act in good faith, with due care and within the framework of their powers and duties, including the care and fiduciary duty. Accordingly to this research, with a comparative study of the American, England, Australian and Iranian law by relying on the analytical descriptive method, various models of the application of the Business-Judgment Rule were pointed out and the factors that led to the use of these models were investigated. Finally we concluded that the chance of using the uniform model of the Business-Judgment Rule is very low; but modern mechanisms of the corporate governance system in the field of responsibility and economic efficiency lead to the implementation of a legal or explicit model of the application of this rule.
care duty, the business-judgment rule, explicit model, fiduciary duty, K, implicit model, Law, derivative litigation, legal model
care duty, the business-judgment rule, explicit model, fiduciary duty, K, implicit model, Law, derivative litigation, legal model
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
