
The article deals with the main provisions of the US doctrine documents published in 2015. Analysis of their unclear omissions and contradictions makes it possible to conclude that most of the defects of the US military planning have appeared at the level of policy and strategy but not at the level of tactics or operative decisions. Instead of overcoming the fundamental disconnect between foreign policy and strategic objectives that is characteristic of the United States, the White House chooses to rely primarily on its supremacy in military technology. This allows the US to win battles - but not wars.
international relations, стратегия, доктрина, JZ2-6530, перенапряжение, политика, doctrine, международные отношения, politics, International relations, strategy, overextension
international relations, стратегия, доктрина, JZ2-6530, перенапряжение, политика, doctrine, международные отношения, politics, International relations, strategy, overextension
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
