
Data collection is a fundamental aspect of linguistic and sociolinguistic research methodologies, and while many scholars may choose to gather their own data, others tend to rely solely on data that are readily available. There are various different methods of elicitation, including conducting interviews, questionnaires or leading focus groups to gather data, either as the main source of information or to complement existing material, which will most likely enhance both the quality of the research as well enriching the researcher’s personal experience. This paper aims to elucidate the experience gained by two researchers who implemented different data-collection methodologies during their research projects, to gather suitable data and conduct their analysis of the English language – one written the other oral – in two diverse, yet specialized, settings. They introduce their subjects of study and the communities in which the studies took place in order to help the reader get acquainted with the context, and then proceed to describe the processes they carried out. Their aim is to offer a retrospective on the decisions made, the evolution of their data-gathering approaches to determine the suitability of the focal methodologies, and the results. The aim of the paper is to contribute to the literature and applied linguistics research fields by disseminating empirical information on the collection of data within different communities of practice, so that it might be used, as a brief guide, to encourage and assist fellow researchers should they decide to embark in their own data collection projects.
Applied Linguistics and Sociolinguistics Surveys, Research Methods in Linguistics, Qualitative Data Gathering, Corpus Linguistics, P1-1091, Philology. Linguistics, Structured Interviews and Questionnaires
Applied Linguistics and Sociolinguistics Surveys, Research Methods in Linguistics, Qualitative Data Gathering, Corpus Linguistics, P1-1091, Philology. Linguistics, Structured Interviews and Questionnaires
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
