Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Revista Brasileira d...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Compatibility and ectomycorrhiza formation among Pisolithus Isolates and Eucalyptus spp Compatibilidade e formação de Ectomicorrizas entre Isolados de Pisolithus e Eucalyptus spp

Authors: Olinto Liparini Pereira; Maurício Dutra Costa; Arnaldo Chaer Borges; Elza Fernandes Araújo; Maria Catarina Megumi Kasuya;

Compatibility and ectomycorrhiza formation among Pisolithus Isolates and Eucalyptus spp Compatibilidade e formação de Ectomicorrizas entre Isolados de Pisolithus e Eucalyptus spp

Abstract

Twenty-nine isolates of the ectomycorrhiza fungus Pisolithus sp. from different geographical and host origins were tested for their ability to form ectomycorrhizae on Eucalyptus grandis and E. urophylla seedlings under greenhouse conditions. The ectomycorrhiza-forming capacity of isolates varied greatly from one eucalypt species to the other. All isolates from Eucalyptus, nine from Pinus spp. and two isolates from unknown hosts formed mycorrhizae with E. grandis and E. urophylla. Root colonization rates varied from 0 to 5.2 % for all Pinus isolates and those from unknown hosts. Colonization rates for these isolates were lower than those observed for Eucalyptus isolates (0.8 to 89.4 %). Three isolates from unknown hosts formed mycorrhizae with neither Eucalyptus species. The main characteristic for distinguishing Pinus from Eucalyptus isolates was mantle color. These data corroborate previous results obtained in our laboratory indicating that the isolates tested represent at least two distinct different species within the genus Pisolithus.Vinte e nove isolados do fungo ectomicorrízico Pisolithus sp., de diferentes regiões geográficas e hospedeiros, foram testados quanto à capacidade de formar ectomicorrizas em plântulas de Eucalyptus grandis e E. urophylla sob condições de casa de vegetação. Os isolados apresentaram grande variação na capacidade de formar ectomicorrizas com ambas as espécies de eucalipto. Todos os isolados originalmente obtidos de Eucalyptus, 9 originalmente obtidos de Pinus spp. e dois isolados de hospedeiros desconhecidos formaram micorrizas com E. grandis e E. urophylla. A taxa de colonização radicular dos isolados originalmente obtidos de Pinus e dos isolados de hospedeiros desconhecidos variou de 0 a 5,2 %. A taxa de colonização para esses isolados foi menor do que as obtidas para os isolados originalmente obtidos de Eucalyptus (0,8 a 89,4 %). Três isolados obtidos de hospedeiros desconhecidos não formaram micorrizas com nenhuma das espécies de Eucalyptus. A característica mais marcante para distinção das ectomicorrizas formadas pelos isolados de Pinus e pelo de Eucalyptus foi a cor do manto fúngico. Esses dados corroboram resultados prévios obtidos em laboratório, indicando que os isolados estudados devem representar ao menos duas espécies distintas dentro do gênero Pisolithus.

Keywords

Eucalyptus grandis, colonização ectomicorrízica, Agriculture (General), ectomycorrhiza colonization, sclerotia, morphological characterization, Eucalyptus urophylla, esclerócio, caracterização morfológica, S1-972

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold