
The article deals with judges’ arbitrary rule and subjectivism, which occur at the stage of court investigation in the Russian criminal court procedure. The issues of the judges’ responsibility for arbitrary rule are discussed; the conditions of the judges’ corrupt behavior are investigated at original jurisdiction.
judges’ arbitrary rule, Economics as a science, Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence, judges’ subjectivism, corruption, K1-7720, HB71-74
judges’ arbitrary rule, Economics as a science, Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence, judges’ subjectivism, corruption, K1-7720, HB71-74
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
