Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Nano-fibrillated cellulose vs bacterial cellulose

Reinforcing ability of nanocellulose obtained topdown or bottom-up
Authors: Lee, Koon-Yang; Tammelin, Tekla; Kiiskinen, Harri; Samela, Juha; Schlufter, Kerstin; Bismarck, Alexander;

Nano-fibrillated cellulose vs bacterial cellulose

Abstract

This work investigates the difference between nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) and bacterial cellulose (BC). BC possesses higher critical surface tension of 57 mN m-1 compared to NFC (41 mN m-1). The thermal degradation temperature of BC was also found to be higher than that of NFC, in both nitrogen and air atmosphere. These results are in good agreement with the higher crystallinity of BC based on area under the XRD spectra, measured to be 71% as compared to NFC of 41%. Both types of nanocellulose papers were found to possess similar tensile moduli and strengths of 12 GPa and 100 MPa, respectively. Nanocomposites were manufactured by infusing the nanocellulose paper with an epoxy resin using vacuum assisted resin infusion. The cellulose reinforced epoxy nanocomposites were found to possess a stiffness and strength of approximately ∼8 GPa and ∼100 MPa at an equivalent fibre volume fraction of 60 vol.-%. In terms of the reinforcing ability of NFC and BC in a polymer matrix, no significant difference between NFC and BC was observed.

Country
Finland
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!