Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ PubMed Centralarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Serveur académique lausannois
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The shadow of trauma: impaired mentalization in clinical populations – a systematic review

Authors: Gorgellino, M.; Kumar, G.; Parkar, Y.; Catalan, A.; Fares-Otero, N.; Debbané, M.; Armando, M.; +1 Authors

The shadow of trauma: impaired mentalization in clinical populations – a systematic review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mentalizing defines the set of social cognitive imaginative activities that enable interpretation of behaviors as arising from intentional mental states. Mentalization impairments have been related to childhood trauma (CT) and are widely present in people suffering from mental disorders. Nevertheless, the link between CT exposure, mentalization abilities, and related psychopathology remains unclear. This study aims to systematically review the evidence in this domain. METHODS: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-compliant systematic review of literature published until December 2022 was conducted through an Ovid search (Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO). The review was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42023455602). RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Twenty studies (69%) showed a significant negative correlation between CT and mentalization. There was solid evidence for this association in patients with psychotic disorders, as almost half the studies focused on this population. The few studies focusing on unipolar depression, personality disorders, and opioid addiction also reported a negative impact of CT on mentalization. In contrast, evidence for post-traumatic stress disorder was inconsistent, and no evidence was found for bipolar disorder. When stratifying for subtypes of CT, there was solid evidence that neglect (physical and emotional) decreased mentalization capacity, while abuse (physical, emotional, or sexual) was not associated with mentalization impairments. CONCLUSIONS: Although causality cannot be established, there was substantial evidence that CT negatively affects mentalization across various psychiatric disorders, particularly psychotic disorders. These findings highlight the potential of targeting mentalization impairments in prevention and treatment strategies aiming to reduce the incidence and the social functioning burden of mental illness.

Keywords

Humans; Mentalization; Mental Disorders/psychology; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology; Psychotic Disorders/psychology; childhood maltreatment; mental disorders; metacognition; neglect; psychosis; social cognition; theory of mind, Review Article

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green