<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Objectives To compare the adjusted and unadjusted-for-weight tidal volume (V T) in ventilated prematurely born infants who were successfully extubated compared with the ones who failed extubation and explore the ability of V T to predict successful extubation. Study Design This is a two-center, prospective, observational, cohort study of ventilated infants born <32 weeks of gestational age (GA) at King's College Hospital and St George's University Hospital, London, United Kingdom between February and September 2018. Expiratory V T was recorded before extubation, and extubation was considered successful if the infants were not reintubated within 72 hours. Results Fifty-six (29 male) infants with a median (interquartile range) GA of 26 (25-29) weeks were studied. The infants who successfully extubated (N = 36) had a higher GA (27 [25-30] weeks) and V T (7.2 [4.8-9.5] mL) compared with the GA (25 [24-26] weeks) and V T (4.3 [4.0-5.5] mL) of the infants who failed extubation (p = 0.002 and p = 0.001, respectively). V T /kg was not different in infants who successfully extubated compared with the ones who failed extubation (p = 0.643). Following multivariate regression, V T was associated with extubation success (adjusted p = 0.022) and GA was not (adjusted p = 0.167). A V T > 4.5 mL predicted successful extubation with 82% sensitivity and 58% specificity (area under the curve = 0.786). Conclusion Successful extubation was associated with higher unadjusted-for-weight V T s compared with failed extubation, and unadjusted V T predicted extubation outcome with moderate sensitivity and specificity.
extubation, prematurely born infants, tidal volume, 610
extubation, prematurely born infants, tidal volume, 610
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |