
Summary: We study the dual of a cooperating distributed grammar system, working in the dual of the terminal derivation mode. We find that the acceptance power of it is exactly the same as the generative power of the original system, deriving in the terminal mode. That way, the results outlined in \textit{H. Fernau}, \textit{M. Holzer} and \textit{H. Bordihn} [Comput. Artif. Intell. 15, No. 2-3, 123-139 (1996; Zbl 0851.68066)] for the other derivation modes in cooperating distributed grammar systems get their natural counterpart for the terminal mode as well.
Grammars and rewriting systems, distributed grammar system
Grammars and rewriting systems, distributed grammar system
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
