Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Croatian Scientific ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Control material for external quality assessment in haematology

Authors: Ćelap, Ivana;

Control material for external quality assessment in haematology

Abstract

As in other laboratory diagnostic fields, the main goal of external quality assessment (EQA) in haematology is to achieve the lowest possible interlaboratory variation for haematological parameters since those parameters are mainly used for monitoring purposes and the differences between two patient results should not be jeopardized by analytical variation between different cell counting principles. Commercial control materials made for EQA purposes are, mostly, analyser specific. Specificity comes out of striving to achieve long term stability of the control material. Manufactures use different approaches to resolve stability issues. Usually, controls are made of preserved and stabilised fresh human blood and/or by addition of surrogate materials (avian, porcine, bovine etc. cells) in leucocytes and platelets deprived blood. Control materials prepared in such way result with morphologically altered red blood cells causing problems in cell counting when obtained by different analysers. Consequently, comparability of the results could be threatened. The best, i.e. commutable control material for interlaboratory comparison in haematology is the fresh blood sample. Despite of its indisputable advantages, that kind of sample has numerous disadvantages which EQA providers must overcome if want fresh blood sample serve as a control material in their haematology scheme. The main reason not using fresh human blood for EQA in haematology is short stability and limited blood volume which can be obtained from donor. To overcome stability problems every EQA provider uses different receipt. The most convenient solution is minimal preservation of blood cells in order to keep the morphological characteristics of the cells. However, maximum stability still could not be longer than a few days. CROQALM successfully provided 3 exercises in haematology scheme using human fresh blood as a control sample. Since haematology scheme has nearly 180 participants, blood dose from single donor is enough to ensure that every laboratory obtains sufficient volume for analysis. Stability issues are overcame by postal delivery within 48 hours.

Keywords

lab haematology control samples, vanjska procjena kvalitete, kontrolni uzorak za lab hematologiju, EQA

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Published in a Diamond OA journal
Related to Research communities