Black holes are incredibly fascinating objects. They largely populate the Universe we live in, attracting whole galaxies around them. They also attract the imagination of novel writers and scientists alike: they represent the ultimate frontier at which our knowledge and intellect can be put to the test. In 1974 Stephen Hawking, building upon suggestions that black holes have a finite temperature, predicted that the event horizon surrounding a black hole separates regions characterized by such an intense space-time distortion that photons and particles are literally ripped out of vacuum state. These photons are then seen from outside the black hole to be emitted as a continuous flux of radiation. Black holes glow, just as if they were light bulbs. Unfortunately, this truly amazing prediction has little hope of being verified directly from astrophysical black holes. The "glow" has an extremely low temperature, of the order of tens of nano-Kelvins and cannot be distinguished amongst the much higher cosmic background temperature. Fortunately, exactly 30 years ago, William Unruh noted that the same arguments that lead to black hole evaporation also predict that a thermal spectrum of sound waves should be given out from a flowing fluid whose velocity is made to vary from sub-sonic to super-sonic velocities. Sound waves will remain blocked at the transition between the sub- and super-sonic regions at what, to all effects, is the analogue of an horizon. It now turns out that horizons are apparently far more common than one may imagine. They appear in flowing tap water as it hits the sink and in a number of water or liquid based scenarios; they appear in flowing Bose-Einstein-Condensates, in polariton condensates and, most importantly for what concerns this project, in moving dielectric media. We may imagine moving a transparent glass sample at velocities close to that of light. We would then have a situation analogous to that of sound waves in a moving fluid: in the presence of a transition from sub-luminal to super-luminal speeds, light waves will not be able to move beyond the horizon point at which the medium velocity is exactly equal to the phase velocity of light. One of the PIs (U. Leonhardt) recently proposed an ingenious method to achieve such horizons in a very simple manner. An intense laser pulse propagating in glass will create a local perturbation in the refractive index that travels together with the pulse, i.e. it naturally travels at light speeds. Any light wave approaching the perturbation will be slowed down by the local increase in refractive index and will eventually be blocked at the horizon beyond which it will be never be able to propagate. Using this very simple proposal, the other project PI (D. Faccio) obtained the first evidence of spontaneous photon emission induced by the dielectric horizon. The perturbation is glowing and evaporating by shedding photons excited from the vacuum state, just as Hawking predicted black holes should do. This project aims at taking forth these results and taking studies on Hawking emission and horizon related effects to the next level. We are now able to plan real experiments that can give us for the first time real data describing how horizons interact with the quantum vacuum. Moreover, at the heart of Hawking emission lies a novel amplification mechanism that, due to the lack of any previous experimental possibilities, has never been truly investigated before. This new amplification channel will be studied and used to amplify light. The goal in mind is to create the first black hole laser in which light is trapped in between two separate horizons. Bouncing back and forth it is amplified at each rebound and finally exponentially explodes in laser-like amplification process. The impact of this project therefore goes well beyond investigation of Hawking effects and invests a number of fields, ranging from quantum field theories to nonlinear optics and photonic technologies.

Seismic hazard assessment and understanding of continental deformation are hindered by unexplained slip-rate fluctuations on faults, associated with (a) temporal clusters of damaging earthquakes lasting 100s to 1000s of years, and (b) longer-term fault quiescence lasting tens to hundreds of millennia. We propose a new unified hypothesis explaining both (a) and (b), involving stress interactions between fault/shear-zones and neighbouring fault/shear-zones; however key data to test this are lacking. We propose measurements and modelling to test our hypothesis, which have the potential to quantify the processes that control continental faulting and fluctuations in the rates of expected earthquake occurrence, with high societal impact. Our aspiration is that cities and critical facilities worldwide will gain additional protection from seismic hazard through use of the calculations we pioneer herein. The background is that slip-rate fluctuations hinder understanding because they introduce uncertainty about whether specific faults are active or not. For example, a review in Japan of earthquake risk to critical facilities, such as the Tsuruga nuclear power plant (NPP), revealed a geological fault under a nuclear reactor (Chapman et al. 2014). The question that arose was whether the fault was active or not. Japan's Nuclear Regulatory Authority (NRA) has guidelines defining fault activity, and considered the fault under the reactor to be active, evidenced by faulting in sediments <~125,000 years in age. The Japan Atomic Energy Power Company (JPAC) disagreed, following study by an independent team of geoscientists. In 2014, the Tsuruga NPP remained closed due to ongoing debate between the NRA and JPAC, with similar debates ongoing for other NPPs. We suggest that defining fault activity as simply "active" or "inactive" is unsatisfactory because it is debatable even amongst experts. In fact a fault that has not slipped in many millennia may, in reality, not be inactive, but instead may simply have a low slip-rate, with the capability to host a damaging earthquake after a long recurrence interval. Our breakthrough is we think slip-rate fluctuations over both timescales (a and b) are a continuum, sharing a common cause involving interaction between fault/shear-zones. For the first time, we provide calculations that describe this interaction, quantifying slip-rate fluctuations and seismic hazard in terms of probabilities. We show that slip during an earthquake cluster on a brittle fault in the upper crust occurs in tandem with high strain-rate on the viscous shear-zone underlying the fault. This deformation of the crust produces changes in differential stress on neighbouring fault/shear-zones. Viscous strain-rate is known to be proportional to differential stress, so, given data on slip-rate fluctuations one can calculate changes in differential stress, and then calculate implied changes to viscous strain-rates on receiver shear zones and slip-rates on their overlying brittle faults. We provide a quantified example covering several millennia, but lack data allowing a test over tens to hundreds of millennia. If we can verify our hypothesis over both timescales, through successful replication of measurements via modelling, we will have identified and quantified a hitherto unknown fundamental geological process. We will study the Athens region, Greece, where a special set of geological attributes allows us to measure and model slip-rate fluctuation over both time scales (a and b), the key data combination never achieved to date. We know of no other quantified explanation that links slip-rate fluctuations over the two timescales; the significance and impact of accomplishing this is that it has the potential to change the way we mitigate hazard for cities and critical facilities. Chapman et al. 2014, Active faults and nuclear power plants, EOS, 95, 4