
handle: 10261/383523
Indoor fungi can cause negative health effects due to the production of toxins or volatiles that trigger the immune system of the occupants. To what degree indoor fungi (mycobiomes) differ between buildings with different usage is poorly known. Here, we compare the indoor mycobiomes in 123 children’s daycare centers and 214 private homes throughout Norway, as revealed by metabarcoding of DNA extracted from dust samples collected by community scientists. Although the fungal richness per se was similar in dust samples from daycares and homes, the fungal community composition differed. Yeast fungi, distributed mainly across the orders Saccharomycetales, Filobasidiales and Tremellales, were proportionally more abundant in the daycares, while filamentous fungi, including spore-producing molds such as Aspergillus, Penicillum and Cladosporium, were relatively more abundant in homes. Number of occupants, which is considerably higher in daycares, correlated significantly with the fungal community shift. We hypothesize that the density of occupants and their age distribution drive the systematic difference of yeasts and filamentous fungi in the two building types.
European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship to PMM-S; grant agreement MycoIndoor No 741332). PMM-S also thanks the grant PID2021-123184OA-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/ https://doi.org/10.13039/501100011033 and ERDF—A way of making Europe.
Peer reviewed
Daycare, Yeasts, Dust, Buildings, Citizen science, Home, Indoor fungi, Kindergarten, House, Molds, Community science, DNA metabarcoding
Daycare, Yeasts, Dust, Buildings, Citizen science, Home, Indoor fungi, Kindergarten, House, Molds, Community science, DNA metabarcoding
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
