Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
DIGITAL.CSIC
Dataset . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: DIGITAL.CSIC
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

[Dataset] Defined covalent attachment of three cancer drugs to DNA origami increases cytotoxicity at nanomolar concentration

Authors: Navarro, Natalia; Aviñó, Anna; Domènech, Òscar; Borrell, Jordi H; Eritja Casadellà, Ramón; Fàbrega, Carme;

[Dataset] Defined covalent attachment of three cancer drugs to DNA origami increases cytotoxicity at nanomolar concentration

Abstract

DNA nanostructures have captured great interest as drug delivery vehicles for cancer therapy. Despite rapid progress in the field, some hurdles, such as low cellular uptake, low tissue specificity or ambiguous drug loading, remain unsolved. Herein, well-known antitumor drugs (doxorubicin, auristatin, and floxuridine) were site-specifically incorporated into DNA nanostructures, demonstrating the potential advantages of covalently linking drug molecules via structural staples instead of incorporating the drugs by noncovalent binding interactions. The covalent strategy avoids critical issues such as an unknown number of drug-DNA binding events and premature drug release. Moreover, covalently modified origami offers the possibility of precisely incorporating several synergetic antitumor drugs into the DNA nanostructure at a predefined molar ratio and to control the exact spatial orientation of drugs into DNA origami. Additionally, DNA-based nanoscaffolds have been reported to have a low intracellular uptake. Thus, two cellular uptake enhancing mechanisms were studied: the introduction of folate units covalently linked to DNA origami and the transfection of DNA origami with Lipofectamine. Importantly, both methods increased the internalization of DNA origami into HTB38 and HCC2998 colorectal cancer cells and produced greater cytotoxic activity when the DNA origami incorporated antiproliferative drugs. The results here present a successful and conceptually distinct approach for the development of DNA-based nanostructures as drug delivery vehicles, which can be considered an important step towards the development of highly precise nanomedicines.

Peer reviewed

Country
Spain
Related Organizations
Keywords

Cancer nanomedicine, Drug conjugates, DNA nanotechnology, DNA origami, Combination therapy, http://metadata.un.org/sdg/3, Covalent conjugation, Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research